|
|
|||||
| Centrepiece
Online | Summer/Fall 2002 |
|||||
|
JUDGE AND PROFESSOR: Pierce Lively '43 Here
Comes the Judge
"Judges are very powerful," says Beth Mayer '02, a government
and history major now working for a bank in Bloomington, Ind. "When
you consider cases like Roe v. Wade you realize just how much they can
change your life."
Students such as Mayer have an unusual opportunity at Centre to learn
how the courts really work. For the last few years, Pierce Lively '43,
a retired federal judge whose opinions are frequently cited in law textbooks,
has joined government professor Dan Stroup in teaching a course on constitutional
law and another on civil liberties.
"Nearly every undergraduate political science department has a course in constitutional law," notes Stroup. "Few, if any, outside Centre have an undergraduate course team-taught by a retired federal circuit court judge. Many
of Judge Lively's colleagues have gone on to teach courses at law schools.
I know of none who teach at the undergraduate level."
In response, Lively points out that he is "particularly
pleased"
that, like Mayer, many in the classes plan careers other than law.
"I'm
much more interested in seeing undergraduates develop an interest in how
our government works," he says. Lively had been a general-practice
lawyer for more than two decades when President Nixon tapped him for the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in 1972. (He was elevated
to chief judge in 1983.) In 25 years on the bench, he earned a reputation
for precise reasoning, clear writing, and courteous demeanor. His court
heard appeals from federal trial courts in Kentucky, Ohio, Michigan, and
Tennessee; Lively himself participated in more than 5,000 cases often
dealing with the thorniest of issues‹abortion rights, school textbooks,
the death penalty, busing and desegregation‹from all four states. Many
of his rulings still stand (although he modestly points out that he has
also been overruled by the Supreme Court).
"Judge
Lively provides background that cannot be recreated in any textbook,"
says Benjamin Beaton '03, a government major from Paducah, Ky.,
who took both courses. "It
was both exciting and a little humbling to study cases he decided during
his career."
Lively admits to a bit of apprehension before first joining the class
back in 1998. "After all, I'm not an academic person,"
he says. "I'm
just a guy who has worked with the law a long time."
Perhaps it helped that he had been a periodic visitor to Stroup's classes
over the years. The two also share a connection to the University of Virginia,
where Lively earned his law degree and Stroup, a master's and doctorate.
The reading lists for both classes feature decisions handed down by the
Supreme Court. Students write their own legal opinions in the constitutional
law class for cases that either are on their way to the high court or
could be. The civil liberties class assigns students to roles as either
judges or lawyers arguing before the court. And students quickly discover
that justice is far more than words on a page. It does, in fact, involve
judgment.
"In
retrospect, [the court's] opinions may appear to be the right answer,
but when you have to make the decision yourself, at the moment, it's not
so clear,"
Stroup points out. "Judge Lively reinforces that by talking about
the issues he has had to deal with as he has made these decisions."
Another dimension Lively brings is first-hand knowledge of the judicial
process.
"We talk about the
whole collective decision making process in the circuit court: those three
judges talking with each other trying to decide, "Stroup says. (A
three-judge team hears each case on the circuit-court level.) "I
think this is a much more effective and accurate way of dealing with the
whole question of judicial process than you find in most political science
courses, which keep statistics on judges' votes and try to predict how
they're going to vote."
Students clearly appreciate the opportunity a team-taught class offers
for two perspectives.
"It
was interesting to see Dr. Stroup and Judge Lively talk about civil rights
issues,"
recalls Mayer. "Dr. Stroup grew up in it . . . but Judge Lively was
already grown and saw it as a lawyer. He told us that our hearts might
tell us one thing, but the law might be different. It seems hard to reconcile
those two. But he showed us you can change the world by the rule of law."
Kathryn Roe Eldridge '00, now in her third year of law school at Washington
and Lee University, agrees.
"Both
Judge Lively and Dr. Stroup gave me a phenomenal insight into the workings
of the judiciary and the legal system,"
says Eldridge.
"I
learned a good lesson, "she
adds. "Judges
are human, and their decisions often reflect their experiences."
It may be that Lively's most significant contribution to the Centre curriculum
is the human face he puts to discussions of great issues.
"Judge
Lively provided personal and professional insight into the practical application
of Supreme Court decisions in the Danville community as a lawyer, parent,
and judge,
"says Beaton, who
hopes to be a judge himself one day. "He
told us of presiding over a P.T.A. when the Danville schools were integrated,
and we read cases he decided that dealt with controversial issues such
as busing and school funding."
But Beaton adds that whether as future judgesor just more
informed citizensstudents also take away a notion of what
it means to be a Centre alumnus.
"Judge
Lively has the talent and credentials to teach at a top-notch law school
anywhere in the country, and he has chosen to spend his time with undergraduates
here at Centre, "Beaton
points out.
"It
says a lot about his devotion for his alma mater."
D.F.J.
Jamey Leahey '92, College lawyer and co-pre-law advisor, interviewed
fellow pre-law advisor Dan Stroup and Pierce Lively '43 for this story.
|
|||||